SandForce SF3700 Controller To Ship by December, 1800MB/s Reads

By Published August 06, 2014 at 9:29 am

This year has been full of delays in the hardware-time continuum, it seems. It feels like forever ago since Maxwell was announced, with Intel's Broadwell and HW-E / X99 platform similarly far behind us. Each of these devices will finally be shipping by the holidays, or so we're told, but that still leaves a major market segment untouched: SSDs. Other than recent innovations in Samsung's NAND lineup, the SSD market has remained relatively silent since our initial SandForce Gen3 controller analysis.

At the Flash Memory Summit in Santa Clara this week, SandForce announced plans to meet a December, 2014 on-shelves timeline with its SF3700 SSD controller. For clarity, SandForce was acquired by LSI some years back, which was recently acquired by Avago Technologies (the same people who make most mouse sensors); Avago is presently in the process of spinning-off SandForce to Seagate, who do not yet have an in-house controller manufacturer. A confusing pattern of acquisitions, to be sure, but its impact will be deep on the controller market. That's something for a future article, though. Technically, SandForce is no longer a standalone company in the market -- it's just a technology under LSI, now. For ease of understanding with our audience, we're going to keep calling it "SandForce" rather than try to balance the various Avago / LSI / Seagate owners.

In the meantime, we've got news on the SF3700 controllers.

We've already discussed the importance of this next generation's controller architecture for SSDs. The industry is moving away from the SATA III (6Gbps) interface as SSDs gain traction in the consumer market; SATA Express (at 10Gbps) and PCI-e 2.x x4 (at 16Gb/s) are more desirable options, but existing consumer controller architecture doesn't adequately make use of available bandwidth.

PCI-e is significantly advantaged over the SATA interface for many reasons, but one of the most important differentiating factors is its bi-directional bus. PCI-e is capable of simultaneously transferring data both ways on the interface, meaning that connected devices can send and receive data (I/O -- reads and writes -- in this case) without needing to delay between each operation. Up through now, PCI-e SSDs have struggled to achieve throughputs higher than 1200MB/s (100% read), even though a theoretical maximum would plant performance around 1800MB/s on an x4 configuration (PCI-e 2.1 x4 transfers at 2GB/s). It is our understanding that this limitation is likely an artifact of how the drive cache is handled on existing PCI-e consumer solutions -- namely that they use all cache for R/W operations / metadata instead of splitting the cache more evenly, which makes for more difficult swapping and garbage collection.

SandForce claimed at Flash Memory Summit today that they've managed to utilize the full x4 bandwidth available from the interface, maxing-out the impending SF3700 controller at 1800MB/s 100% sequential read operations in design. The company overlaid its own SF3700 datarate on top of a benchmark performed by TweakTown, generating the following slide:


Shown here, SandForce claims that its 80/20 (R/W percentage) sequential performance lands its device well above competing SATA and PCI-e / mSATA devices, resting at 1400MB/s transfer. SandForce emphasized that most SSDs presently generate a "bathtub curve" on performance charts, meaning that they tend to perform best toward 100% read and 100% write, with poor performance between. Alleging an unrealistic use case scenario, the company then went on to highlight its higher target performance in more real-world mixed workload (R/W) environments.

SHIELD Error Correction & Drive Endurance


Again, SHIELD is something we previously explained in the initial SF3700 write-up. The new data from SandForce suggests that its error correction technology is capable of significantly amplifying NAND endurance by modifying its error correction code rate (historically 55 bits per 512-byte sector on MLC). The end result is that 3K P/E (program/erase -- the amount of times the NAND can be written and erased before death) can conservatively be boosted to 5K P/E cycles strictly by using smarter error correction on the controller side. The effect scales to a theoretical maximum of 15x the P/E cycles by using stronger codes, which would result in 45K P/E cycles on 3K NAND. This is more of an outlier, really, but even at 5K P/E cycles from 3K, that's a major endurance gain for consumer and enterprise devices.

As for what manufacturers will be using SandForce's Gen3 controller, we can't yet say, but it'd be safe to state that "existing manufacturers have no reason not to update product lines." Ahem.

We'll have more on controller architecture in a future analytical piece. Stay tuned to the site for that information.

- Steve "Lelldorianx" Burke.

Steve Burke

Steve started GamersNexus back when it was just a cool name, and now it's grown into an expansive website with an overwhelming amount of features. He recalls his first difficult decision with GN's direction: "I didn't know whether or not I wanted 'Gamers' to have a possessive apostrophe -- I mean, grammatically it should, but I didn't like it in the name. It was ugly. I also had people who were typing apostrophes into the address bar - sigh. It made sense to just leave it as 'Gamers.'"

First world problems, Steve. First world problems.

We moderate comments on a ~24~48 hour cycle. There will be some delay after submitting a comment.


  VigLink badge