AMD Hands-On: Polaris Demo vs. GTX 950, Future of HDR Screen Technology

By Published January 07, 2016 at 11:50 pm

AMD’s new Polaris architecture discretely sat in the company’s CES 2016 suite, running Star Wars Battlefront with impressively low system power consumption. Quietly the GPU sat, running a completely new architecture and process for GPUs. No fanfare, no bombastic marketing videos projected on the walls, no product unveil insanity.

The demo was simple: Show two Intel i5 Haswell systems side-by-side, one with an nVidia GTX 950 ($160) and one with AMD’s undisclosed Polaris GPU. AMD locked framerate to 60FPS in the demo, showing both GPUs at a constant 60FPS using the X-Wing Survival map (singleplayer), and directing focus toward Kill-A-Watt wall meters. The wall meters show total system watt consumption and, as one would expect from an AMD suite, the AMD-powered system ran at lower total system power consumption overall.

When running the game outside of menus, we observed a power consumption of ~80-90W for the AMD Polaris system and ~130-140W for the nVidia Maxwell system. Impressively low for each – we weren’t provided with system specs outside of “some kind of Haswell i5” and the GPUs – but there’s a clear lead for the Polaris card.


This, of course, isn’t all there is to the story. Both cards tied with the locked framerate – 60FPS for each – but we wanted to unlock that FPS. It’s easily done; we’ve done it in our Battlefront CPU and Battlefront GPU benchmarks. Typing  gametime.maxvariablefps 0 and disabling any sync technology would have fully unlocked framerate for a more accurate observation. The point here is that, one, Battlefront isn’t a very GPU intensive game – we achieved 60+ FPS on GTX 960s at 1080p/Ultra pre-performance patch – and, two, absolute performance metrics would have told clearer story as to whether the Polaris card can stand against the 950 in framerate. As of now, we know that AMD’s demonstrated Polaris SKU is theoretically superior in watt draw – that’s it. Game performance is not available at this time.

Ignoring the limited information and careful conveyance thereof, AMD’s made it clear that the fusion of GCN 4th Gen and FinFET 14nm process yields an impressively low watt draw. Of this fact we are certain, based upon our demonstration today.

HDR Screens

AMD’s seemingly-annual display demonstration shifted focus from adaptive synchronization to HDR. High-Dynamic Range lighting is used in photography, videography, and games, but is bottlenecked by modern 8-bit color displays. SDR, or Standard Dynamic Range, is what everyone’s used to in desktop use cases; the colors are less sharp and accurate as gamma approaches its outer limits, yielding less pure blacks and less accurate teals, golds, and reds.

AMD wants to move beyond 8-bit displays and into 30-bit-plus display technology, saying “everyone’s been saying ‘more pixels,’ it’s time to make ‘better pixels.’” We witnessed the tech in side-by-side demonstration and can attest to its increased apparent texture depth and fidelity. Lines are sharper, additional apparent depth enters perceivable range as colors become more distinct, and everything feels overall ‘brighter.’

The displays weren’t powered by AMD technology, but the company sees itself as a champion for the push into HDR from SDR. AMD has encouraged developers and display partners to move in this direction, telling us that game devs have thus far responded positively; AMD mentioned that developers projected appropriate engine tweaks as requiring just a few weeks to support increased bit-depth of displays.

Razer Blade Stealth & External GPU


The above video contains some introductory information on Razer’s new Stealth Blade notebook and external GPU combination. The biggest change between this solution and last year’s Alienware box (or previous Silverstone box) is its support of hot-plug video cards. No shut-down required to connect a GPU – it can be connected and disconnected by plug cycle or Windows UI prompting, the very same used for managing external drive connections. Learn more in the above video.

Check back shortly for additional AMD information.

Writing, Presenter: Steve “Lelldorianx” Burke
Film & Editing: Keegan “HornetSting” Gallick
Photography: Jim Vincent

Last modified on January 07, 2016 at 11:50 pm
Steve Burke

Steve started GamersNexus back when it was just a cool name, and now it's grown into an expansive website with an overwhelming amount of features. He recalls his first difficult decision with GN's direction: "I didn't know whether or not I wanted 'Gamers' to have a possessive apostrophe -- I mean, grammatically it should, but I didn't like it in the name. It was ugly. I also had people who were typing apostrophes into the address bar - sigh. It made sense to just leave it as 'Gamers.'"

First world problems, Steve. First world problems.

We moderate comments on a ~24~48 hour cycle. There will be some delay after submitting a comment.

  VigLink badge